You're Wrong
A statement. Two sides. No neutral ground. Students pick a position and defend it — then the class tries to tear it apart.
You're Wrong generates a debatable statement on any topic along with a pro side and a con side, each with a title, keyword list, and pre-structured arguments. The point is a quicker, looser discussion than a traditional formal debate — every statement is designed to be genuinely questionable and arguable, and every student gets a turn to speak.
You're Wrong generates a single debatable statement — a claim that is genuinely arguable in both directions — alongside a fully scaffolded pro position and con position. Each position has a descriptive title, a set of supporting keywords, and a list of pre-structured arguments (short talking points, not full sentences, for students to build on). Argument count scales with CEFR: 3 arguments per side at A2 and B1, 5 at B2, and 6 at C1/C2.